Nowadays, Energy Efficiency is one
of the most important issues that world is trying to solve. Building
construction industry is involved in a major part of total annual energy
consumption of every country. Consequently, finding new approaches to provide
more energy efficient procedures in building construction has been taken into
consideration. Therefore, the concept of green buildings came up and different
green building rating systems have been developed in many countries all around
the world.
In year 1998, United States Green Building Council (USGBC) developed
a nationally accepted benchmark for green building industry named as Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). Generally, the main purpose of
implementing LEED for assessing buildings was to assure the energy efficiency
and environmentally sustainability of them. However, it has been observed that
some LEED-certified buildings consume much more energy than similar non-certified
ones. So, what is the point in implementing such rating system when there is no
guarantee for the building to be more energy efficient? Why do some LEED-certified
buildings consume more energy than the anticipated model?
For answering this
question we may compare the energy consumption data of some LEED-certified
buildings with each other. It seems that these inconsistencies are not completely
caused by the suggested reasons such as lack of inter-operation between parties,
changes in construction, Climate or equipment induced differences, etc. We
think that there might be a problem in implementation practices. Finding the
solution for this question needs more categorized comparison of the actual
versus anticipated energy performance data, using statistical approaches. So,
by comparing the data achieved from different buildings and comparing them in
each dividend of energy consumption (such as plug loads, air conditioning,
lighting systems, etc.) we can find were the implementation problem could be.
No comments:
Post a Comment